No Matter How the CMIP5 (IPCC AR5) Models Are Presented They Still Look Bad
10/04/2013
http://goo.gl/3qVZXI
Science utterly abandoned in UN climate change report: 15 years of data selectively ignored
October 02, 2013 by: J. D. Heyes
http://goo.gl/qOyUrS
The IPCC AR5 – First impressions
By Nir Shaviv, Wed, 2013-10-02
http://goo.gl/fywKA3
"I think the real reason why there is no improvement in the understanding of climate sensitivity is the following. If you have a theory which is correct, then as progressively more data comes in, the agreement becomes better. Sure, occasionally some tweaks have to be made, but overall there is an improved agreement. However, if the basic premises of a theory are wrong, then there is no improved agreement as more data is collected. In fact, it is usually the opposite that takes place, the disagreement increases. In other words, the above behavior reflects the fact that the IPCC and alike are captives of a wrong conception."
IPCC Conclusions Were Drawn Up Three Years Ago – Before Any of The Science Was Done
10/01/2013
http://goo.gl/L1l4nD
IN THE AFTERMATH OF AR5.
by Pointman on September 29, 2013
http://goo.gl/ug3KMJ
Climate Change Report: Science Fiction
September 27, 2013
http://goo.gl/zmpXmc
For 20 years global warming has been a growth industry. The IPCC report is spin, and not worth the paper it’s printed on.
The IPCC report...
1) Reflects the views of the scientists behind it.
2) Is written by politicians, for politicians.
95 per cent of intelligent people know the new IPCC report is utter drivel
By James Delingpole
September 24th, 2013
http://q.gs/4q8DS
Climategate II: leaked emails show struggle to deal with warming lull
September 20, 2013 Associated Press
http://q.gs/4q8Kn
