Experts call for more details on Guangdong uranium plant
Concern over sketchy nature of details and possible radiation risks from proposed nuclear development in Guangdong
Wednesday, 10 July, 2013
Olga Wong and Minnie Chan SCMP
Nie Jiao, 70, and her husband will give up their pig farm fish pool if the plant is built on the site.
Nuclear experts and green activists have called for more information from the Guangdong government after limited details were released about its proposal for a uranium processing plant in Jiangmen, about 100 kilometres from Hong Kong.
An announcement by the Jiangmen City Development and Reform Bureau said the 230-hectare plant would carry out uranium conversion, enrichment and fuel fabrication.
But the three-page statement, issued last Thursday, did not make it clear whether the plant, in the Longwan industrial district of Zhishanzhen, would perform spent fuel reprocessing - recycling of old fuel rods that could emit high doses of radiation - or what measures would be used to avoid radiation leaks.
It did, however, say that the amount of radiation affecting workers in the plant would only be equivalent to receiving one X-ray scan.
"My concern is that poor protective measures could lead to pollution of food chains by the leakage of uranium dust," Dr Luk Bing-lam, past chairman of the Hong Kong Institution of Engineers' nuclear division, said.
Uranium dust could cause leukaemia if absorbed by the human body, he said.
"Placing the plant in an industrial park instead of a remote area could also present security issues," he added. "What if uranium gets stolen and sold for making dirty bombs?"
http://digcan.com/nuclear
Placing the plant in an industrial park instead of a remote area could also present security issues. What if uranium gets stolen and sold for making dirty bombs?
Luk said the plant seemed to involve processing of natural uranium, which would emit radiation relatively higher than that from granite rock. "But we are not 100 per cent sure given the limited information made available by the government," he added.
The bureau is holding a 10-day public consultation that ends on Saturday. Luk urged the government to enhance transparency by inviting professionals to visit the plant and setting up an authority to monitor the safety of its operation.
Chair professor of nuclear engineering at City University Woo Chung-ho said he could only guess that the purpose of the plant was to provide more fuel for second-generation reactors or the navy. But he said China should have sufficient expertise to build and operate such a plant.
Greenpeace campaigner Prentice Koo Wai-muk said there might be no direct impact on Hong Kong from the plant "but it could be worrying if the uranium gets into our food".
The bureau said it would set up monitoring stations to collect data about pollutants found in surrounding areas, adding that affected villagers had agreed to move to make way for the plant.
Zheng Qian, a 58-year-old representative of Lianzhu Village, said the 160 residents would move to a new site the same size as their village near the government headquarters. They were given a relocation fee of HK$220,000 and a construction fee for their houses. "It's a desirable arrangement for a village as remote as ours," Zheng said.
One villager said he would just have to accept the "reality" of the situation, but a motorcycle driver living in the area said the plant was incompatible with tourism in nearby Zhuhai .
"The safer the government says it is, the more worried I am," he said. "This government cannot be trusted."
This article appeared in the South China Morning Post print edition as Experts call for facts on uranium processing plant
